Re: [PATCH 00/19] amba: store owner from modules with amba_driver_register()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 03:29:26PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 16/04/2024 12:41, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> > + Greg
> > 
> > 
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> > 
> > On 30/03/2024 18:00, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 30/03/2024 18:58, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 21:23:30 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>>> Merging
> >>>> =======
> >>>> All further patches depend on the first amba patch, therefore please ack
> >>>> and this should go via one tree.
> >>>>
> >>>> Description
> >>>> ===========
> >>>> Modules registering driver with amba_driver_register() often forget to
> >>>> set .owner field.
> >>>>
> >>>> [...]
> >>>
> >>> Applied, thanks!
> >>>
> >>> [01/19] amba: store owner from modules with amba_driver_register()
> >>>          (no commit info)
> >>
> >> Patchset applied here:
> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux-dt.git/log/?h=for-v6.10/module-owner-amba
> > 
> > How do you plan to push this ? Given this affects most of the drivers/, 
> > do you plan to send this to Greg ? We have changes in the coresight
> > tree that would conflict with this "tag" ( I haven't merged them yet, 
> > but is in my local queue). I want to make sure we can avoid the
> > conflicts. I am happy to merge this to my local tree and base the
> > changes on this, if this is going in for v6.10 and all are in agreement.
> 
> I pushed it to arm-linux patches but it hasn't been picked up.
> 
> I propose you take entire set then.

You are again being, IMHO, abrasive with your attitude. So far, every
interaction with you has been abrasive and bordering on abusive.

You haven't asked me whether I will take them. I will - just not at the
moment because 

I HAVE MEDICAL APPOINTMENTS LAST WEEK AND THIS WEEK WHICH MEAN I AM
NOT SPENDING ALL MY TIME ON THE KERNEL.

Have some bloody patience rather than behaving in your standard
objectionable manner.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux