On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 2:23 AM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Applied to kvm-x86 svm, thanks! > > [1/8] KVM: SVM: Create a stack frame in __svm_vcpu_run() for unwinding > https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/19597a71a0c8 > [2/8] KVM: SVM: Wrap __svm_sev_es_vcpu_run() with #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_AMD_SEV > https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/7774c8f32e99 > [3/8] KVM: SVM: Drop 32-bit "support" from __svm_sev_es_vcpu_run() > https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/331282fdb15e > [4/8] KVM: SVM: Clobber RAX instead of RBX when discarding spec_ctrl_intercepted > https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/87e8e360a05f > [5/8] KVM: SVM: Save/restore non-volatile GPRs in SEV-ES VMRUN via host save area > https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/c92be2fd8edf > [6/8] KVM: SVM: Save/restore args across SEV-ES VMRUN via host save area > https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/adac42bf42c1 > [7/8] KVM: SVM: Create a stack frame in __svm_sev_es_vcpu_run() > https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/4367a75887ec > [8/8] KVM: x86: Stop compiling vmenter.S with OBJECT_FILES_NON_STANDARD > https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/27ca867042af Do we perhaps want this in 6.9 because of the issues that was reported with objtool? Paolo