Re: [PATCH v2 04/43] arm64: RME: Handle Granule Protection Faults (GPFs)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/04/2024 09:42, Steven Price wrote:
If the host attempts to access granules that have been delegated for use
in a realm these accesses will be caught and will trigger a Granule
Protection Fault (GPF).

A fault during a page walk signals a bug in the kernel and is handled by
oopsing the kernel. A non-page walk fault could be caused by user space
having access to a page which has been delegated to the kernel and will
trigger a SIGBUS to allow debugging why user space is trying to access a
delegated page.

Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@xxxxxxx>
---
  arch/arm64/mm/fault.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
index 8251e2fea9c7..91da0f446dd9 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
@@ -765,6 +765,25 @@ static int do_tag_check_fault(unsigned long far, unsigned long esr,
  	return 0;
  }
+static int do_gpf_ptw(unsigned long far, unsigned long esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	const struct fault_info *inf = esr_to_fault_info(esr);
+
+	die_kernel_fault(inf->name, far, esr, regs);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int do_gpf(unsigned long far, unsigned long esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	const struct fault_info *inf = esr_to_fault_info(esr);
+
+	if (!is_el1_instruction_abort(esr) && fixup_exception(regs))
+		return 0;
+
+	arm64_notify_die(inf->name, regs, inf->sig, inf->code, far, esr);
+	return 0;
+}
+
  static const struct fault_info fault_info[] = {
  	{ do_bad,		SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL,	"ttbr address size fault"	},
  	{ do_bad,		SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL,	"level 1 address size fault"	},
@@ -802,11 +821,11 @@ static const struct fault_info fault_info[] = {
  	{ do_alignment_fault,	SIGBUS,  BUS_ADRALN,	"alignment fault"		},
  	{ do_bad,		SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL,	"unknown 34"			},
  	{ do_bad,		SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL,	"unknown 35"			},

Should this also be converted to do_gpf_ptw, "GPF at level -1", given we support LPA2 ?


-	{ do_bad,		SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL,	"unknown 36"			},
-	{ do_bad,		SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL,	"unknown 37"			},
-	{ do_bad,		SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL,	"unknown 38"			},
-	{ do_bad,		SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL,	"unknown 39"			},
-	{ do_bad,		SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL,	"unknown 40"			},
+	{ do_gpf_ptw,		SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL,	"Granule Protection Fault at level 0" },
+	{ do_gpf_ptw,		SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL,	"Granule Protection Fault at level 1" },
+	{ do_gpf_ptw,		SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL,	"Granule Protection Fault at level 2" },
+	{ do_gpf_ptw,		SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL,	"Granule Protection Fault at level 3" },
+	{ do_gpf,		SIGBUS,  SI_KERNEL,	"Granule Protection Fault not on table walk" },
  	{ do_bad,		SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL,	"level -1 address size fault"	},
  	{ do_bad,		SIGKILL, SI_KERNEL,	"unknown 42"			},
  	{ do_translation_fault,	SIGSEGV, SEGV_MAPERR,	"level -1 translation fault"	},


Rest looks fine to me.

Suzuki




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux