Re: [RFC PATCH 27/41] KVM: x86/pmu: Clear PERF_METRICS MSR for guest

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 26, 2024, Xiong Zhang wrote:
> From: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Since perf topdown metrics feature is not supported yet, clear
> PERF_METRICS MSR for guest.

Please rewrite with --verbose, I have no idea what MSR_PERF_METRICS, and thus no
clue why it needs to be zeroed when loading guest context, e.g. it's not passed
through, so why does it matter?

> Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
> index 4b4da7f17895..ad0434646a29 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
> @@ -916,6 +916,10 @@ static void intel_restore_pmu_context(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	 */
>  	for (i = pmu->nr_arch_fixed_counters; i < kvm_pmu_cap.num_counters_fixed; i++)
>  		wrmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR0 + i, 0);
> +
> +	/* Clear PERF_METRICS MSR since guest topdown metrics is not supported yet. */
> +	if (kvm_caps.host_perf_cap & PMU_CAP_PERF_METRICS)
> +		wrmsrl(MSR_PERF_METRICS, 0);
>  }
>  
>  struct kvm_pmu_ops intel_pmu_ops __initdata = {
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux