Right now, we were using individual KVM_CAP entities to communicate
userspace about which cpuids we support. This is suboptimal, since it
generates a delay between the feature arriving in the host, and
being available at the guest.
A much better mechanism is to list para features in KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID.
This makes userspace automatically aware of what we provide. And if we
ever add a new cpuid bit in the future, we have to do that again,
which create some complexity and delay in feature adoption.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index eb84947..a51b560 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -1971,6 +1971,23 @@ static void do_cpuid_ent(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry, u32 function,
}
break;
}
+ case KVM_CPUID_SIGNATURE: {
+ char signature[12] = "KVMKVMKVM\0\0";
+ u32 *sigptr = (u32 *)signature;
+ entry->eax = 0;
+ entry->ebx = sigptr[0];
+ entry->ecx = sigptr[1];
+ entry->edx = sigptr[2];
+ break;
+ }
+ case KVM_CPUID_FEATURES:
+ entry->eax = (1 << KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE) |
+ (1 << KVM_FEATURE_NOP_IO_DELAY) |
+ (1 << KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE2);
+ entry->ebx = 0;
+ entry->ecx = 0;
+ entry->edx = 0;
+ break;
case 0x80000000:
entry->eax = min(entry->eax, 0x8000001a);
break;
@@ -2017,6 +2034,23 @@ static int kvm_dev_ioctl_get_supported_cpuid(struct kvm_cpuid2 *cpuid,
for (func = 0x80000001; func <= limit && nent < cpuid->nent; ++func)
do_cpuid_ent(&cpuid_entries[nent], func, 0,
&nent, cpuid->nent);
+
+
+
+ r = -E2BIG;
+ if (nent >= cpuid->nent)
+ goto out_free;
+
+ do_cpuid_ent(&cpuid_entries[nent], KVM_CPUID_SIGNATURE, 0, &nent,
+ cpuid->nent);
+
+ r = -E2BIG;
+ if (nent >= cpuid->nent)
+ goto out_free;
+
+ do_cpuid_ent(&cpuid_entries[nent], KVM_CPUID_FEATURES, 0, &nent,
+ cpuid->nent);
+
r = -E2BIG;
if (nent >= cpuid->nent)
goto out_free;
--
1.6.2.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
