On 05.04.24 05:20, Michael Ellerman wrote: > "Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)" > <regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Hi, Thorsten here, the Linux kernel's regression tracker. Top-posting >> for once, to make this easily accessible to everyone. >> >> Was this regression ever resolved? Doesn't look like it, but maybe I >> just missed something. > > I'm not sure how it ended up on the regression list. That is easy to explain: I let lei search for mails containing words like regress, bisect, and revert to become aware of regressions that might need tracking. And... > IMHO it's not really a regression. ...sometimes I misjudge or misinterpret something and add it to the regression tracking. Looks like that happened here. Sorry for that and the noise it caused! #regzbot resolve: invalid: was not really a regression in the first place Ciao, Thorsten
