On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 12:26:48AM -0800, isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>Some of TDG.VP.VMCALL require device model, for example, qemu, to handle
>them on behalf of kvm kernel module. TDVMCALL_REPORT_FATAL_ERROR,
>TDVMCALL_MAP_GPA, TDVMCALL_SETUP_EVENT_NOTIFY_INTERRUPT, and
>TDVMCALL_GET_QUOTE requires user space VMM handling.
>
>Introduce new kvm exit, KVM_EXIT_TDX, and functions to setup it. Device
>model should update R10 if necessary as return value.
>
>Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx>
>---
>v14 -> v15:
>- updated struct kvm_tdx_exit with union
>- export constants for reg bitmask
>
>Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx>
>---
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 170 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
>index c8eb47591105..72dbe2ff9062 100644
>--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
>+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
>@@ -1038,6 +1038,78 @@ static int tdx_emulate_vmcall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return 1;
> }
>
>+static int tdx_complete_vp_vmcall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>+{
>+ struct kvm_tdx_vmcall *tdx_vmcall = &vcpu->run->tdx.u.vmcall;
>+ __u64 reg_mask = kvm_rcx_read(vcpu);
>+
>+#define COPY_REG(MASK, REG) \
>+ do { \
>+ if (reg_mask & TDX_VMCALL_REG_MASK_ ## MASK) \
>+ kvm_## REG ## _write(vcpu, tdx_vmcall->out_ ## REG); \
>+ } while (0)
Why XMMs are not copied?
Looks you assume the guest won't use XMMs for TDVMCALL. But I think the ABI
(KVM_EXIT_TDX) should be general, i.e., can support all kinds of (future)
TDVMCALLs.
>+
>+
>+ COPY_REG(R10, r10);
>+ COPY_REG(R11, r11);
>+ COPY_REG(R12, r12);
>+ COPY_REG(R13, r13);
>+ COPY_REG(R14, r14);
>+ COPY_REG(R15, r15);
>+ COPY_REG(RBX, rbx);
>+ COPY_REG(RDI, rdi);
>+ COPY_REG(RSI, rsi);
>+ COPY_REG(R8, r8);
>+ COPY_REG(R9, r9);
>+ COPY_REG(RDX, rdx);
>+
>+#undef COPY_REG
>+
>+ return 1;
>+}
