On Wednesday, April 3, 2024 5:42 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Sun, Mar 31, 2024, Wei W Wang wrote: > > On Wednesday, March 13, 2024 8:32 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > > To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Subject: [ANNOUNCE] PUCK Agenda - 2024.03.13 - No topic > > > > > > No topic for tomorrow, but I'll be online. > > > > > > Note, the US just did its Daylight Savings thing, so the local time > > > might be different for you this week. > > > > > > Note #2, PUCK is canceled for the next two weeks as I'll be offline. > > > > > > Future Schedule: > > > March 20th - CANCELED > > > March 27th - CANCELED > > > > Would there be a slot available on April 3rd? > > I'd like to have a discussion about KVM uAPIs for TDX and SNP Live Migration. > > > > CC the ones who would be interested in joining the discussion. > > (Hope more folks working on the SNP migration part could join) > > What exactly do you want to discuss and/or achieve? We can have a > handwavy discussion about TDX's needs for live migration, but there's > basically zero chance you'll get concrete feedback on exact uAPIs at this stage > (we haven't even nailed down the core TDX and SNP uAPI). Doubly so without > first giving people *something* to look at. Even a very rough RFC would go a > long way toward showing/describing the problem you need/want to solve. The first talk aims at a high-level discussion, for example, what kind of uAPIs are needed (not concrete feedback on each uAPI detail), in terms of what are conceptually common in live migration of a TD and SNP guest. I think from the uAPI design perspective, the migration part could be independent from the core TDX and SNP uAPI. Please see the slides attached.
Attachment:
KVM uAPIs for TDX and SNP Live Migration.pptx
Description: KVM uAPIs for TDX and SNP Live Migration.pptx
