On Thu, 2024-03-28 at 09:36 +0800, Xiaoyao Li wrote: > > > > Any reason to mask off non-configurable bits rather than return an error? this > > > > is misleading to userspace because guest sees the values emulated by TDX module > > > > instead of the values passed from userspace (i.e., the request from userspace > > > > isn't done but there is no indication of that to userspace). > > > > > > Ok, I'll eliminate them. If user space passes wrong cpuids, TDX module will > > > return error. I'll leave the error check to the TDX module. > > > > I was just looking at this. Agreed. It breaks the selftests though. > > If all you prefer to go this direction, then please update the error > handling of this specific SEAMCALL. What do you mean by SEAMCALL, TDH_MNG_INIT? Can you be more specific?
