Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] Inter-VM shared memory PCI device

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/10/2010 10:28 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 05/10/2010 06:22 PM, Cam Macdonell wrote:


+
+    /* if the position is -1, then it's shared memory region fd */
+    if (incoming_posn == -1) {
+
+        s->num_eventfds = 0;
+
+        if (check_shm_size(s, incoming_fd) == -1) {
+            exit(-1);
+        }
+
+        /* creating a BAR in qemu_chr callback may be crazy */
+        create_shared_memory_BAR(s, incoming_fd);

It probably is... why can't you create it during initialization?
This is for the shared memory server implementation, so the fd for the
shared memory has to be received (over the qemu char device) from the
server before the BAR can be created via qemu_ram_mmap() which adds
the necessary memory



We could do the handshake during initialization. I'm worried that the device will appear without the BAR, and strange things will happen. But the chardev API is probably not geared for passing data during init.

Anthony, any ideas?

Why can't we create the BAR with just normal RAM and then change it to a mmap()'d fd after initialization? This will be behavior would be important for live migration as it would let you quickly migrate preserving the memory contents without waiting for an external program to reconnect.

Regards,

Anthony Lioguori

Otherwise, if the BAR is allocated during initialization, I would have
to use MAP_FIXED to mmap the memory.  This is what I did before the
qemu_ram_mmap() function was added.

What would happen to any data written to the BAR before the the handshake completed? I think it would disappear.

You don't have to do MAP_FIXED. You can allocate a ram area and map that in when disconnected. When you connect, you create another ram area and memcpy() the previous ram area to the new one. You then map the second ram area in.

From the guest's perspective, it's totally transparent. For the backend, I'd suggest having an explicit "initialized" ack or something so that it knows that the data is now mapped to the guest.

If you're doing just a ring queue in shared memory, it should allow disconnect/reconnect during live migration asynchronously to the actual qemu live migration.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

So it's a good idea to make the initialization process atomic.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux