On Sat, 2 Mar 2024 at 03:40, Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The exit code is always checked, so let's properly handle the -ETIMEDOUT > error code. > > Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Rae Moar <rmoar@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240301194037.532117-4-mic@xxxxxxxxxxx > --- This looks good to me. It might make sense to use a switch statement rather than a change of else-ifs if we end up handling more errors in the future, but this is fine for now. Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx> Cheers, -- David > > Changes since v1: > * Added Kees's Reviewed-by. > --- > lib/kunit/try-catch.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/lib/kunit/try-catch.c b/lib/kunit/try-catch.c > index 73f5007f20ea..cab8b24b5d5a 100644 > --- a/lib/kunit/try-catch.c > +++ b/lib/kunit/try-catch.c > @@ -79,7 +79,6 @@ void kunit_try_catch_run(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch, void *context) > time_remaining = wait_for_completion_timeout(&try_completion, > kunit_test_timeout()); > if (time_remaining == 0) { > - kunit_err(test, "try timed out\n"); > try_catch->try_result = -ETIMEDOUT; > kthread_stop(task_struct); > } > @@ -94,6 +93,8 @@ void kunit_try_catch_run(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch, void *context) > try_catch->try_result = 0; > else if (exit_code == -EINTR) > kunit_err(test, "wake_up_process() was never called\n"); > + else if (exit_code == -ETIMEDOUT) > + kunit_err(test, "try timed out\n"); > else if (exit_code) > kunit_err(test, "Unknown error: %d\n", exit_code); > > -- > 2.44.0 >
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
