Re: [PATCH 08/16] KVM: x86/mmu: WARN and skip MMIO cache on private, reserved page faults

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 28/02/2024 3:41 pm, Sean Christopherson wrote:
WARN and skip the emulated MMIO fastpath if a private, reserved page fault
is encountered, as private+reserved should be an impossible combination
(KVM should never create an MMIO SPTE for a private access).

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 3 ++-
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index bd342ebd0809..9206cfa58feb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -5866,7 +5866,8 @@ int noinline kvm_mmu_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t cr2_or_gpa, u64 err
  		error_code |= PFERR_PRIVATE_ACCESS;
r = RET_PF_INVALID;
-	if (unlikely(error_code & PFERR_RSVD_MASK)) {
+	if (unlikely((error_code & PFERR_RSVD_MASK) &&
+		     !WARN_ON_ONCE(error_code & PFERR_PRIVATE_ACCESS))) {
  		r = handle_mmio_page_fault(vcpu, cr2_or_gpa, direct);
  		if (r == RET_PF_EMULATE)
  			goto emulate;

It seems this will make KVM continue to call kvm_mmu_do_page_fault() when such private+reserve error code actually happens (e.g., due to bug), because @r is still RET_PF_INVALID in such case.

Is it better to just return error, e.g., -EINVAL, and give up?




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux