On Wed, 5 May 2010 08:39:47 pm Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Hi! > I see this in virtio_ring.c: > > /* Put entry in available array (but don't update avail->idx * > until they do sync). */ > > Why is it done this way? > It seems that updating the index straight away would be simpler, while > this might allow the host to specilatively look up the buffer and handle > it, without waiting for the kick. I agree. From my TODO: what if we actually expose in ->add_buf? I don't *think* anyone adds buffers without being ready for them to be used, so changing this should be safe. Want to give it a try and report back? Thanks! Rusty. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html