On Tue, Feb 27, 2024, Dongli Zhang wrote: > > > On 2/27/24 18:41, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Plumb the full 64-bit error code throughout the page fault handling code > > so that KVM can use the upper 32 bits, e.g. SNP's PFERR_GUEST_ENC_MASK > > will be used to determine whether or not a fault is private vs. shared. > > > > Note, passing the 64-bit error code to FNAME(walk_addr)() does NOT change > > the behavior of permission_fault() when invoked in the page fault path, as > > KVM explicitly clears PFERR_IMPLICIT_ACCESS in kvm_mmu_page_fault(). > > May this lead to a WARN_ON_ONCE? > > 5843 int noinline kvm_mmu_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t cr2_or_gpa, > u64 error_code, > 5844 void *insn, int insn_len) > 5845 { > ... ... > 5856 */ > 5857 if (WARN_ON_ONCE(error_code & PFERR_IMPLICIT_ACCESS)) > 5858 error_code &= ~PFERR_IMPLICIT_ACCESS; Nope, it shouldn't. PFERR_IMPLICIT_ACCESS is a synthetic, KVM-defined flag, and should never be in the error code passed to kvm_mmu_page_fault(). If the WARN fires, it means hardware (specifically, AMD CPUs for #NPF) has started using the bit for something, and that we need to update KVM to use a different bit. > > Continue passing '0' from the async #PF worker, as guest_memfd() and thus > > :s/guest_memfd()/guest_memfd/ ? I've been styling it as guest_memfd() to make it look like a syscall, e.g. like memfd_create(), when I'm talking about a file that was created by userspace, as opposed to GUEST_MEMFD when I'm talking about the ioctl() itself.