Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] target/i386: add control bits support for LAM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 02:00:42PM +0800, Binbin Wu wrote:
> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 14:00:42 +0800
> From: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [PATCH v4 2/2] target/i386: add control bits support for LAM
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1
> 
> LAM uses CR3[61] and CR3[62] to configure/enable LAM on user pointers.
> LAM uses CR4[28] to configure/enable LAM on supervisor pointers.
> 
> For CR3 LAM bits, no additional handling needed:
> - TCG
>   LAM is not supported for TCG of target-i386.  helper_write_crN() and
>   helper_vmrun() check max physical address bits before calling
>   cpu_x86_update_cr3(), no change needed, i.e. CR3 LAM bits are not allowed
>   to be set in TCG.
> - gdbstub
>   x86_cpu_gdb_write_register() will call cpu_x86_update_cr3() to update cr3.
>   Allow gdb to set the LAM bit(s) to CR3, if vcpu doesn't support LAM,
>   KVM_SET_SREGS will fail as other reserved bits.
> 
> For CR4 LAM bit, its reservation depends on vcpu supporting LAM feature or
> not.
> - TCG
>   LAM is not supported for TCG of target-i386.  helper_write_crN() and
>   helper_vmrun() check CR4 reserved bit before calling cpu_x86_update_cr4(),
>   i.e. CR4 LAM bit is not allowed to be set in TCG.
> - gdbstub
>   x86_cpu_gdb_write_register() will call cpu_x86_update_cr4() to update cr4.
>   Mask out LAM bit on CR4 if vcpu doesn't support LAM.
> - x86_cpu_reset_hold() doesn't need special handling.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Xuelian Guo <xuelian.guo@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  target/i386/cpu.h    | 7 ++++++-
>  target/i386/helper.c | 4 ++++
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Reviewed-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@xxxxxxxxx>

> 
> diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.h b/target/i386/cpu.h
> index 18ea755644..598a3fa140 100644
> --- a/target/i386/cpu.h
> +++ b/target/i386/cpu.h
> @@ -261,6 +261,7 @@ typedef enum X86Seg {
>  #define CR4_SMAP_MASK   (1U << 21)
>  #define CR4_PKE_MASK   (1U << 22)
>  #define CR4_PKS_MASK   (1U << 24)
> +#define CR4_LAM_SUP_MASK (1U << 28)
>  
>  #define CR4_RESERVED_MASK \
>  (~(target_ulong)(CR4_VME_MASK | CR4_PVI_MASK | CR4_TSD_MASK \
> @@ -269,7 +270,8 @@ typedef enum X86Seg {
>                  | CR4_OSFXSR_MASK | CR4_OSXMMEXCPT_MASK | CR4_UMIP_MASK \
>                  | CR4_LA57_MASK \
>                  | CR4_FSGSBASE_MASK | CR4_PCIDE_MASK | CR4_OSXSAVE_MASK \
> -                | CR4_SMEP_MASK | CR4_SMAP_MASK | CR4_PKE_MASK | CR4_PKS_MASK))
> +                | CR4_SMEP_MASK | CR4_SMAP_MASK | CR4_PKE_MASK | CR4_PKS_MASK \
> +                | CR4_LAM_SUP_MASK))
>  
>  #define DR6_BD          (1 << 13)
>  #define DR6_BS          (1 << 14)
> @@ -2522,6 +2524,9 @@ static inline uint64_t cr4_reserved_bits(CPUX86State *env)
>      if (!(env->features[FEAT_7_0_ECX] & CPUID_7_0_ECX_PKS)) {
>          reserved_bits |= CR4_PKS_MASK;
>      }
> +    if (!(env->features[FEAT_7_1_EAX] & CPUID_7_1_EAX_LAM)) {
> +        reserved_bits |= CR4_LAM_SUP_MASK;
> +    }
>      return reserved_bits;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/target/i386/helper.c b/target/i386/helper.c
> index 2070dd0dda..1da7a7d315 100644
> --- a/target/i386/helper.c
> +++ b/target/i386/helper.c
> @@ -219,6 +219,10 @@ void cpu_x86_update_cr4(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t new_cr4)
>          new_cr4 &= ~CR4_PKS_MASK;
>      }
>  
> +    if (!(env->features[FEAT_7_1_EAX] & CPUID_7_1_EAX_LAM)) {
> +        new_cr4 &= ~CR4_LAM_SUP_MASK;
> +    }
> +
>      env->cr[4] = new_cr4;
>      env->hflags = hflags;
>  
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 
> 




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux