Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: eliminate TS_XSAVE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/04/2010 09:24 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

I would like to request one change, however.  I would like to see the
alternatives code to be:

	movb $0,reg
	movb $1,reg

... instead of using xor (which has to be padded with NOPs, which is of
course pointless since the slot is a fixed size.)

Right.

I would suggest using
a byte-sized variable instead of a dword-size variable to save a few
bytes, too.

I used a bool, and the code already compiles to a byte mov. Though it could be argued that a word instruction is better since it avoids a false dependency, and allows a preceding instruction that modifies %reg to be executed after the mov instruction.

Once the jump label framework is integrated and has matured, I think we
should consider using it to save the mov/test/jump.

IIRC that has an implied unlikely() which isn't suitable here?

Perhaps the immediate values patches.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux