On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 01:11:02PM +0800, Zenghui Yu wrote: > No, you're right. My intention was to fix it in patch #10. And as > you've both pointed out, using xa_erase_irq() can hardly be the correct > fix. My mistake :-( . Still -- thank you for pointing out the very obvious bug at the end of the series :) -- Thanks, Oliver
