On 05/04/2010 12:11 PM, Roedel, Joerg wrote:
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 03:53:57AM -0400, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 05/03/2010 07:32 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 03:58:36PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
So we probably need to upgrade gva_t to a u64. Please send this as
a separate patch, and test on i386 hosts.
Are there _any_ regular tests of KVM on i386 hosts? For me this is
terribly broken (also after I fixed the issue which gave me a
VMEXIT_INVALID at the first vmrun).
No, apart from the poor users. I'll try to set something up using nsvm.
Ok. I will post an initial fix for the VMEXIT_INVALID bug soon. Apart
from that I get a lockdep warning when I try to start a guest. The guest
actually boots if it is single-vcpu. SMP guests don't even boot through
the BIOS for me.
Strange. i386 vs x86_64 shouldn't have that much effect!
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
