On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 02:27:28PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote: > Drop dirty_log_page_splitting_test's assertion that the number of 4KiB > pages remains the same across dirty logging being enabled and disabled, as > the test doesn't guarantee that mappings outside of the memslots being > dirty logged are stable, e.g. KVM's mappings for code and pages in > memslot0 can be zapped by things like NUMA balancing. > > To preserve the spirit of the check, assert that (a) the number of 4KiB > pages after splitting is _at least_ the number of 4KiB pages across all > memslots under test, and (b) the number of hugepages before splitting adds > up to the number of pages across all memslots under test. (b) is a little > tenuous as it relies on memslot0 being incompatible with transparent > hugepages, but that holds true for now as selftests explicitly madvise() > MADV_NOHUGEPAGE for memslot0 (__vm_create() unconditionally specifies the > backing type as VM_MEM_SRC_ANONYMOUS). > > Reported-by: Yi Lai <yi1.lai@xxxxxxxxx> > Reported-by: Tao Su <tao1.su@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../x86_64/dirty_log_page_splitting_test.c | 21 +++++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/dirty_log_page_splitting_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/dirty_log_page_splitting_test.c > index 634c6bfcd572..4864cf3fae57 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/dirty_log_page_splitting_test.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/dirty_log_page_splitting_test.c > @@ -92,7 +92,6 @@ static void run_test(enum vm_guest_mode mode, void *unused) > uint64_t host_num_pages; > uint64_t pages_per_slot; > int i; > - uint64_t total_4k_pages; > struct kvm_page_stats stats_populated; > struct kvm_page_stats stats_dirty_logging_enabled; > struct kvm_page_stats stats_dirty_pass[ITERATIONS]; > @@ -107,6 +106,9 @@ static void run_test(enum vm_guest_mode mode, void *unused) > guest_num_pages = vm_adjust_num_guest_pages(mode, guest_num_pages); > host_num_pages = vm_num_host_pages(mode, guest_num_pages); > pages_per_slot = host_num_pages / SLOTS; > + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(host_num_pages, pages_per_slot * SLOTS); > + TEST_ASSERT(!(host_num_pages % 512), > + "Number of pages, '%lu' not a multiple of 2MiB", host_num_pages); > > bitmaps = memstress_alloc_bitmaps(SLOTS, pages_per_slot); > > @@ -165,10 +167,8 @@ static void run_test(enum vm_guest_mode mode, void *unused) > memstress_free_bitmaps(bitmaps, SLOTS); > memstress_destroy_vm(vm); > > - /* Make assertions about the page counts. */ > - total_4k_pages = stats_populated.pages_4k; > - total_4k_pages += stats_populated.pages_2m * 512; > - total_4k_pages += stats_populated.pages_1g * 512 * 512; > + TEST_ASSERT_EQ((stats_populated.pages_2m * 512 + > + stats_populated.pages_1g * 512 * 512), host_num_pages); > > /* > * Check that all huge pages were split. Since large pages can only > @@ -180,19 +180,22 @@ static void run_test(enum vm_guest_mode mode, void *unused) > */ > if (dirty_log_manual_caps) { > TEST_ASSERT_EQ(stats_clear_pass[0].hugepages, 0); > - TEST_ASSERT_EQ(stats_clear_pass[0].pages_4k, total_4k_pages); > + TEST_ASSERT(stats_clear_pass[0].pages_4k >= host_num_pages, > + "Expected at least '%lu' 4KiB pages, found only '%lu'", > + host_num_pages, stats_clear_pass[0].pages_4k); > TEST_ASSERT_EQ(stats_dirty_logging_enabled.hugepages, stats_populated.hugepages); > } else { > TEST_ASSERT_EQ(stats_dirty_logging_enabled.hugepages, 0); > - TEST_ASSERT_EQ(stats_dirty_logging_enabled.pages_4k, total_4k_pages); > + TEST_ASSERT(stats_dirty_logging_enabled.pages_4k >= host_num_pages, > + "Expected at least '%lu' 4KiB pages, found only '%lu'", > + host_num_pages, stats_clear_pass[0].pages_4k); Here should print stats_dirty_logging_enabled.pages_4k, not stats_clear_pass[0].pages_4k. Everything else looks great. Reviewed-by: Tao Su <tao1.su@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > } > > /* > * Once dirty logging is disabled and the vCPUs have touched all their > - * memory again, the page counts should be the same as they were > + * memory again, the hugepage counts should be the same as they were > * right after initial population of memory. > */ > - TEST_ASSERT_EQ(stats_populated.pages_4k, stats_repopulated.pages_4k); > TEST_ASSERT_EQ(stats_populated.pages_2m, stats_repopulated.pages_2m); > TEST_ASSERT_EQ(stats_populated.pages_1g, stats_repopulated.pages_1g); > } > > base-commit: f0f3b810edda57f317d79f452056786257089667 > -- > 2.43.0.429.g432eaa2c6b-goog >