On Tue, Dec 19, 2023, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2023, David Stevens wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 11:30 PM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2023, David Stevens wrote: > > > > Sean, have you been waiting for a new patch series with responses to > > > > Maxim's comments? I'm not really familiar with kernel contribution > > > > etiquette, but I was hoping to get your feedback before spending the > > > > time to put together another patch series. > > > > > > No, I'm working my way back toward it. The guest_memfd series took precedence > > > over everything that I wasn't confident would land in 6.7, i.e. larger series > > > effectively got put on the back burner. Sorry :-( > > > > Is this series something that may be able to make it into 6.8 or 6.9? > > 6.8 isn't realistic. Between LPC, vacation, and non-upstream stuff, I've done > frustratingly little code review since early November. Sorry :-( > > I haven't paged this series back into memory, so take this with a grain of salt, > but IIRC there was nothing that would block this from landing in 6.9. Timing will > likely be tight though, especially for getting testing on all architectures. I did a quick-ish pass today. If you can hold off on v10 until later this week, I'll try to take a more in-depth look by EOD Thursday.
