Re: [PATCH v18 050/121] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Sprinkle __must_check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 1/23/2024 7:53 AM, isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx>

TDP MMU allows tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic() and tdp_mmu_zap_spte_atomic() to
return -EBUSY or -EAGAIN error.  The caller must check the return value and
retry.  Sprinkle __must_check to guarantee it.

Reviewed-by: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 10 +++++-----
  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index fdc6e2221c33..2aacfab25e93 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -507,9 +507,9 @@ static void handle_changed_spte(struct kvm *kvm, int as_id, gfn_t gfn,
   *            no side-effects other than setting iter->old_spte to the last
   *            known value of the spte.
   */
-static inline int tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
-					  struct tdp_iter *iter,
-					  u64 new_spte)
+static inline int __must_check tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
+						       struct tdp_iter *iter,
+						       u64 new_spte)
  {
  	u64 *sptep = rcu_dereference(iter->sptep);
@@ -539,8 +539,8 @@ static inline int tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
  	return 0;
  }
-static inline int tdp_mmu_zap_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
-					  struct tdp_iter *iter)
+static inline int __must_check tdp_mmu_zap_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
+						       struct tdp_iter *iter)
  {
  	int ret;





[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux