On 04/30/2010 12:05 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
If 'oos_shadow' == 0, intercepting invlpg command is really unnecessary. And it's good for us to compare the performance between enable 'oos_shadow' and disable 'oos_shadow' @@ -74,8 +74,9 @@ static int dbg = 0; module_param(dbg, bool, 0644); #endif -static int oos_shadow = 1; +int __read_mostly oos_shadow = 1; module_param(oos_shadow, bool, 0644); +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(oos_shadow);
Please rename to kvm_oos_shadow to reduce potential for conflict with other global names.
But really, this is a debug option, I don't expect people to run with oos_shadow=0, so there's not much motivation to optimize it.
-- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
