Re: [PATCH 00/15] KVM: arm64: Improvements to GICv3 LPI injection

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 11:02:01AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:

[...]

> > I would've liked to have benchmark data showing the improvement on top
> > of upstream with this series, but I'm currently having issues with our
> > internal infrastructure and upstream kernels. However, this series has
> > been found to have a near 2x performance improvement to redis-memtier [*]
> > benchmarks on our kernel tree.
> 
> It'd be really good to have upstream-based numbers, with details of
> the actual setup (device assignment? virtio?) so that we can compare
> things and even track regressions in the future.

Yeah, that sort of thing isn't optional IMO, I just figured that getting
reviews on this would be a bit more productive while I try and recreate
the test correctly on top of upstream.

The test setup I based my "2x" statement on is 4 16 vCPU client VMs
talking to 1 16 vCPU server VM over NIC VFs assigned to the
respective VMs. 16 TX + 16 RX queues for each NIC. As I'm sure you're
aware, I know damn near nothing about the Redis setup itself, and I'll
need to do a bit of work to translate the thing I was using into a
script.

-- 
Thanks,
Oliver




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux