On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:41:51PM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote: > On 04/28/10 12:30, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:31:00AM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote: > >> On 04/22/10 03:12, Kevin O'Connor wrote: > >> Generating the more complex tables dynamically would be preferred, but > >> it requires like half an AML compiler in Seabios, so it kinda stalled > >> there.... > >> > > We can try to be smart and generate most of the code statically and only > > minimum that absolutely required dynamically. Haven't looked at how > > simple dynamic part can be made. > > I looked at it briefly and ran away screaming :) I am sure it can be This is normal reaction to ACPI of a healthy human being. > done, bit it would require pretty good understanding of the AML encodings. > > The CPU declarations are particularly tricky as they get pretty big and > complex and need to live in the DSDT, whereas a lot of other things we > can shift off to separate SSDT tables and only put the minimum that > needs to be generated dynamically in it's own table. > We can generate complex code statically and call it from dynamically generated CPU declarations. -- Gleb. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
