On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 01:49:45PM -0800, Atish Patra wrote:
> +static noinline void pmu_sbi_start_ovf_ctrs_snapshot(struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt,
> + unsigned long ctr_ovf_mask)
> +{
> + int idx = 0;
> + struct perf_event *event;
> + unsigned long flag = SBI_PMU_START_FLAG_INIT_FROM_SNAPSHOT;
> + u64 max_period, init_val = 0;
> + struct hw_perf_event *hwc;
> + unsigned long ctr_start_mask = 0;
> + struct riscv_pmu_snapshot_data *sdata = cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr;
> +
> + for_each_set_bit(idx, cpu_hw_evt->used_hw_ctrs, RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS) {
> + if (ctr_ovf_mask & (1 << idx)) {
> + event = cpu_hw_evt->events[idx];
> + hwc = &event->hw;
> + max_period = riscv_pmu_ctr_get_width_mask(event);
> + init_val = local64_read(&hwc->prev_count) & max_period;
> + sdata->ctr_values[idx] = init_val;
> + }
> + /* We donot need to update the non-overflow counters the previous
> + * value should have been there already.
> + */
One nit for if this is resent, you've got the wrong comment style here.
Otherwise, looks like the things we discussed before got addressed:
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cheers,
Conor.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
