On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 01:16:41PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > Oliver, should your tree be in -next? > No, we don't have the KVM/arm64 fixes in -next. I see it's not, I'm asking if it should be - given the latencies involved it seems like it'd be helpful for keeping -next working. > And we have another two weeks to release, so ample amount of > time until Paolo picks up the PR. Sure, but we do also have the holidays and also the fact that it's a build failure in a configuration used by some of the CIs means that we've got a bunch of testing that simply hasn't been happening for a couple of weeks now.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
