On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 08:27:51AM -0500, Michael Roth wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> index 4f895a7201ed..088b32657f46 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> @@ -2568,6 +2568,7 @@ static int sev_es_validate_vmgexit(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
> case SVM_VMGEXIT_AP_HLT_LOOP:
> case SVM_VMGEXIT_AP_JUMP_TABLE:
> case SVM_VMGEXIT_UNSUPPORTED_EVENT:
> + case SVM_VMGEXIT_HV_FEATURES:
> break;
> default:
> reason = GHCB_ERR_INVALID_EVENT;
> @@ -2828,6 +2829,13 @@ static int sev_handle_vmgexit_msr_protocol(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
> GHCB_MSR_INFO_MASK,
> GHCB_MSR_INFO_POS);
> break;
> + case GHCB_MSR_HV_FT_REQ: {
^^^
No need to have a statement block here. Neither below.
> + set_ghcb_msr_bits(svm, GHCB_HV_FT_SUPPORTED,
> + GHCB_MSR_HV_FT_MASK, GHCB_MSR_HV_FT_POS);
> + set_ghcb_msr_bits(svm, GHCB_MSR_HV_FT_RESP,
> + GHCB_MSR_INFO_MASK, GHCB_MSR_INFO_POS);
> + break;
> + }
> case GHCB_MSR_TERM_REQ: {
> u64 reason_set, reason_code;
>
> @@ -2952,6 +2960,12 @@ int sev_handle_vmgexit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> ret = 1;
> break;
> }
> + case SVM_VMGEXIT_HV_FEATURES: {
^^^^
> + ghcb_set_sw_exit_info_2(svm->sev_es.ghcb, GHCB_HV_FT_SUPPORTED);
> +
> + ret = 1;
> + break;
> + }
> case SVM_VMGEXIT_UNSUPPORTED_EVENT:
> vcpu_unimpl(vcpu,
> "vmgexit: unsupported event - exit_info_1=%#llx, exit_info_2=%#llx\n",
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
