On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 05:36:52PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 04/26/2010 05:12 PM, Chris Wright wrote: > >* Anthony Liguori (anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > >>On 04/26/2010 12:26 PM, Chris Wright wrote: > >>>Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. > >>> > >>>While I don't expect it to be the case this week, if we have a > >>>lack of agenda items I'll cancel the week's call. > >>- qemu management interface (and libvirt) > >>- stable tree policy (push vs. pull and call for stable volunteers) > >block plug in (follow-on from qmp block watermark) > > A few comments: > > 1) The problem was not block watermark itself but generating a > notification on the watermark threshold. It's a heuristic and > should be implemented based on polling block stats. Otherwise, > we'll be adding tons of events to qemu that we'll struggle to > maintain. > Network cards have low number of rx/tx buffers interrupt. This is also heuristic. Do you think driver should poll for this event instead and NIC designers just wasted their time designing the feature? -- Gleb. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
