Re: [PATCH 8/8] iommu/vt-d: Add set_dev_pasid callback for nested domain

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/27/2023 2:34 PM, Yi Liu wrote:
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

This allows the upper layers to set a nested type domain to a PASID of a
device if the PASID feature is supported by the IOMMU hardware.

The set_dev_pasid callback for non-nest domain has already be there, so
this only needs to add it for nested domains.

Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/iommu/intel/nested.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 47 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/nested.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/nested.c
index 44ad48db7ea0..f6f687750104 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/nested.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/nested.c
@@ -68,6 +68,52 @@ static int intel_nested_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain,
  	return 0;
  }
+static int intel_nested_set_dev_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
+				      struct device *dev, ioasid_t pasid)
+{
+	struct device_domain_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
+	struct dmar_domain *dmar_domain = to_dmar_domain(domain);
+	struct intel_iommu *iommu = info->iommu;
+	struct dev_pasid_info *dev_pasid;
+	unsigned long flags;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	if (!pasid_supported(iommu))
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+	if (iommu->agaw < dmar_domain->s2_domain->agaw)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	ret = prepare_domain_attach_device(&dmar_domain->s2_domain->domain, dev);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	dev_pasid = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev_pasid), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!dev_pasid)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	ret = domain_attach_iommu(dmar_domain, iommu);
+	if (ret)
+		goto err_free;
+
+	ret = intel_pasid_setup_nested(iommu, dev, pasid, dmar_domain);
+	if (ret)
+		goto err_detach_iommu;
+
+	dev_pasid->dev = dev;
+	dev_pasid->pasid = pasid;
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&dmar_domain->lock, flags);
+	list_add(&dev_pasid->link_domain, &dmar_domain->dev_pasids);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dmar_domain->lock, flags);

---> list_add(&dev_pasid->link_domain, &dmar_domain->dev_pasids);

dev_pasid is linked at later time, this leads to domain->has_iotlb_device is not correctly set, which finally results into a missing of device iotlb flush in iommu_flush_dev_iotlb()when it's called.
Check this call path:
domain_attach_iommu()->domain_update_iommu_cap()->domain_update_iotlb()->domain->has_iotlb_device = has_iotlb_device; The ugly fixup is to call domain_update_iommu_cap() or domain_update_iotlb() here again before return.
The similar issue is in intel_iommu_set_dev_pasid() and intel_nested_attach_dev().
+
+	return 0;
+err_detach_iommu:
+	domain_detach_iommu(dmar_domain, iommu);
+err_free:
+	kfree(dev_pasid);
+	return ret;
+}
+
  static void intel_nested_domain_free(struct iommu_domain *domain)
  {
  	kfree(to_dmar_domain(domain));
@@ -128,6 +174,7 @@ static int intel_nested_cache_invalidate_user(struct iommu_domain *domain,
static const struct iommu_domain_ops intel_nested_domain_ops = {
  	.attach_dev		= intel_nested_attach_dev,
+	.set_dev_pasid		= intel_nested_set_dev_pasid,
  	.free			= intel_nested_domain_free,
  	.cache_invalidate_user	= intel_nested_cache_invalidate_user,
  };





[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux