On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:41:21AM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 04/27/2010 09:17 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > > >>The fact that 2.6.33.3 does not generate this makes me wonder why it > >>obviously lacks the above patch. Not required or not yet queued? > >> > >Doesn't make much sense to include it in stable-32, but not stable-33. I > >think stable-32 just has more attention since it is used by many > >distribution as base kernel. > > This was due to the previous process of mindlessly applying patches > to stable without testing/looking at them first. Hopefully the new > process will deliver better results. > > Gleb, can you look at 2.6.33 and see if it is missing something, or > maybe the warning is gone for another reason? > Already looked at it. 2.6.33-stable misses the patch that cause warning in 2.6.32-stable. -- Gleb. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
