On Thu, 7 Dec 2023 15:11:56 +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> It appears that under some cirumstances, the lifetime of a vcpu
> doesn't correctly align with that of the structure describing the
> redistributor associated with that vcpu. That's not great.
>
> Fixing it is, unfortunately, not as trivial as it appears as the
> required locking gets in the way.
>
> [...]
Applied to kvmarm/fixes, thanks!
[1/5] KVM: arm64: vgic: Simplify kvm_vgic_destroy()
https://git.kernel.org/kvmarm/kvmarm/c/01ad29d224ff
[2/5] KVM: arm64: vgic: Add a non-locking primitive for kvm_vgic_vcpu_destroy()
https://git.kernel.org/kvmarm/kvmarm/c/d26b9cb33c2d
[3/5] KVM: arm64: vgic: Force vcpu vgic teardown on vcpu destroy
https://git.kernel.org/kvmarm/kvmarm/c/02e3858f08fa
[4/5] KVM: arm64: vgic: Ensure that slots_lock is held in vgic_register_all_redist_iodevs()
https://git.kernel.org/kvmarm/kvmarm/c/6bef365e310a
[5/5] KVM: Convert comment into an assertion in kvm_io_bus_register_dev()
https://git.kernel.org/kvmarm/kvmarm/c/b1a39a718db4
--
Best,
Oliver
