Re: [PATCH 03/10] tests/avocado/intel_iommu.py: increase timeout

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Cleber Rosa <crosa@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Based on many runs, the average run time for these 4 tests is around
> 250 seconds, with 320 seconds being the ceiling.  In any way, the
> default 120 seconds timeout is inappropriate in my experience.

I would rather see these tests updated to fix:

 - Don't use such an old Fedora 31 image
 - Avoid updating image packages (when will RH stop serving them?)
 - The "test" is a fairly basic check of dmesg/sysfs output

I think building a buildroot image with the tools pre-installed (with
perhaps more testing) would be a better use of our limited test time.

FWIW the runtime on my machine is:

➜  env QEMU_TEST_FLAKY_TESTS=1 ./pyvenv/bin/avocado run ./tests/avocado/intel_iommu.py
JOB ID     : 5c582ccf274f3aee279c2208f969a7af8ceb9943
JOB LOG    : /home/alex/avocado/job-results/job-2023-12-11T16.53-5c582cc/job.log
 (1/4) ./tests/avocado/intel_iommu.py:IntelIOMMU.test_intel_iommu: PASS (44.21 s)
 (2/4) ./tests/avocado/intel_iommu.py:IntelIOMMU.test_intel_iommu_strict: PASS (78.60 s)
 (3/4) ./tests/avocado/intel_iommu.py:IntelIOMMU.test_intel_iommu_strict_cm: PASS (65.57 s)
 (4/4) ./tests/avocado/intel_iommu.py:IntelIOMMU.test_intel_iommu_pt: PASS (66.63 s)
RESULTS    : PASS 4 | ERROR 0 | FAIL 0 | SKIP 0 | WARN 0 | INTERRUPT 0 | CANCEL 0
JOB TIME   : 255.43 s

-- 
Alex Bennée
Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro





[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux