Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: x86/intr: Explicitly check NMI from guest to eliminate false positives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/12/2023 11:30 pm, Sean Christopherson wrote:
Please don't make up random prefixes.  This should really be "x86/pmu".

Thanks.

I'm hesitant to categorize about NMI handling into kvm/pmu scope. But you
have clear idea on it and it's fine to me. Please feel free to refine commit
message to fit your understanding and taste as you did.


 From Documentation/process/maintainer-kvm-x86.rst:

Shortlog
~~~~~~~~
The preferred prefix format is ``KVM: <topic>:``, where ``<topic>`` is one of::

   - x86
   - x86/mmu
   - x86/pmu
   - x86/xen
   - selftests
   - SVM
   - nSVM
   - VMX
   - nVMX


...

New topics do occasionally pop up, but please start an on-list discussion if
you want to propose introducing a new topic, i.e. don't go rogue.




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux