Re: Converting manpages from asciidoc to rst2man ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 6:36 AM Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Dimitri John Ledkov <dimitri.ledkov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I was going through build-depends on linux kernel in Ubuntu and I
> > noticed that whilst most documentation and man-pages are written in
> > Rst format, there are a few that require asciidoc.
> >
> > $ git grep -l asciidoc -- '*Makefile*'
> > tools/kvm/kvm_stat/Makefile
> > tools/lib/perf/Documentation/Makefile
> > tools/perf/Documentation/Makefile
> > tools/perf/Makefile.perf

Fwiw, I'd be in favor of perf not using asciidoc and would be happy to
review patches making the change to rst. Ultimately merging wouldn't
be my decision though :-)

Thanks,
Ian


> Interesting...I was unaware of those...
>
> > Are both Rst and asciidoc preferred in the kernel Documentation? Or
> > should we upgrade kvm_stat & perf manpages from asciidoc to rst2man?
>
> In general we don't have a lot of man pages in the kernel, so it's not
> something we've put a lot of thought into.  Ideally, I suppose, it would
> be nice to get all of those man pages integrated into the RST docs
> build, but it's not something that is likely to inspire any great sense
> of urgency.
>
> Thanks,
>
> jon
>





[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux