Re: [PATCH v2 13/35] KVM: x86: hyper-v: optimize and cleanup kvm_hv_process_stimers()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yury Norov <yury.norov@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> The function traverses stimer_pending_bitmap in a for-loop bit by bit.
> We can do it faster by using atomic find_and_set_bit().
>
> While here, refactor the logic by decreasing indentation level.
>
> CC: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
> index 238afd7335e4..a0e45d20d451 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
> @@ -870,27 +870,26 @@ void kvm_hv_process_stimers(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	if (!hv_vcpu)
>  		return;
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(hv_vcpu->stimer); i++)
> -		if (test_and_clear_bit(i, hv_vcpu->stimer_pending_bitmap)) {
> -			stimer = &hv_vcpu->stimer[i];
> -			if (stimer->config.enable) {
> -				exp_time = stimer->exp_time;
> -
> -				if (exp_time) {
> -					time_now =
> -						get_time_ref_counter(vcpu->kvm);
> -					if (time_now >= exp_time)
> -						stimer_expiration(stimer);
> -				}
> -
> -				if ((stimer->config.enable) &&
> -				    stimer->count) {
> -					if (!stimer->msg_pending)
> -						stimer_start(stimer);
> -				} else
> -					stimer_cleanup(stimer);
> -			}
> +	for_each_test_and_clear_bit(i, hv_vcpu->stimer_pending_bitmap,
> +					ARRAY_SIZE(hv_vcpu->stimer)) {
> +		stimer = &hv_vcpu->stimer[i];
> +		if (!stimer->config.enable)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		exp_time = stimer->exp_time;
> +
> +		if (exp_time) {
> +			time_now = get_time_ref_counter(vcpu->kvm);
> +			if (time_now >= exp_time)
> +				stimer_expiration(stimer);
>  		}
> +
> +		if (stimer->config.enable && stimer->count) {
> +			if (!stimer->msg_pending)
> +				stimer_start(stimer);
> +		} else
> +			stimer_cleanup(stimer);

Minor nitpick: it's better (and afair required by coding style) to use
'{}' for both branches here:

	if (stimer->config.enable && stimer->count) {
		if (!stimer->msg_pending)
			stimer_start(stimer);
	} else {
		stimer_cleanup(stimer);
	}

> +	}
>  }
>  
>  void kvm_hv_vcpu_uninit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)

Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Vitaly





[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux