Drop the "name" parameter from KVM_X86_PMU_FEATURE(), it's unused and
the name is redundant with the macro, i.e. it's truly useless.
Reviewed-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h
index 932944c4ea01..4f737d3b893c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ struct kvm_x86_cpu_property {
struct kvm_x86_pmu_feature {
struct kvm_x86_cpu_feature anti_feature;
};
-#define KVM_X86_PMU_FEATURE(name, __bit) \
+#define KVM_X86_PMU_FEATURE(__bit) \
({ \
struct kvm_x86_pmu_feature feature = { \
.anti_feature = KVM_X86_CPU_FEATURE(0xa, 0, EBX, __bit), \
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ struct kvm_x86_pmu_feature {
feature; \
})
-#define X86_PMU_FEATURE_BRANCH_INSNS_RETIRED KVM_X86_PMU_FEATURE(BRANCH_INSNS_RETIRED, 5)
+#define X86_PMU_FEATURE_BRANCH_INSNS_RETIRED KVM_X86_PMU_FEATURE(5)
static inline unsigned int x86_family(unsigned int eax)
{
--
2.43.0.rc2.451.g8631bc7472-goog
