RE: [PATCH v12 24/37] x86/idtentry: Incorporate definitions/declarations of the FRED entries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On November 28, 2023 10:39:01 AM PST, "Li, Xin3" <xin3.li@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > FRED and IDT can share most of the definitions and declarations so
>> > that in the majority of cases the actual handler implementation is the
>> > same.
>> >
>> > The differences are the exceptions where FRED stores exception related
>> > information on the stack and the sysvec implementations as FRED can
>> > handle irqentry/exit() in the dispatcher instead of having it in each
>> > handler.
>> >
>> > Also add stub defines for vectors which are not used due to Kconfig
>> > decisions to spare the ifdeffery in the actual FRED dispatch code.
>> >
>> > Tested-by: Shan Kang <shan.kang@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Signed-off-by: Xin Li <xin3.li@xxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> This makes me wonder too who the author is. The commit message text sounds
>> like tglx. :)
>
>You have a very good sense 😊
>
>This is mostly from his review comments and suggestions on my original
>changes to IDTENTRY.  So probably I should put a "Suggested-by" instead
>of "Signed-off-by" as HPA pointed out!
>
>Thanks!
>    Xin
>

Remember that Signed-off-by: relates to the *patch flow*.





[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux