Fix the comment about what can and cannot happen when mmu_unsync_pages_lock is not help. The comment correctly mentions "clearing sp->unsync", but then it talks about unsync going from 0 to 1. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c index 1cb81573a60b..a71b8813febe 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c @@ -2840,9 +2840,9 @@ int mmu_try_to_unsync_pages(struct kvm *kvm, const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, /* * Recheck after taking the spinlock, a different vCPU * may have since marked the page unsync. A false - * positive on the unprotected check above is not + * negative on the unprotected check above is not * possible as clearing sp->unsync _must_ hold mmu_lock - * for write, i.e. unsync cannot transition from 0->1 + * for write, i.e. unsync cannot transition from 1->0 * while this CPU holds mmu_lock for read (or write). */ if (READ_ONCE(sp->unsync)) -- 2.39.1
