Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: fix kvm_has_noapic_vcpu updates when fail to create vcpu

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 06:15:44AM +0000, Li,Rongqing wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2023 11:14 PM
> > To: Li,Rongqing <lirongqing@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: x86@xxxxxxxxxx; kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: fix kvm_has_noapic_vcpu updates when fail to
> > create vcpu
> > 
> > On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 08:26:33PM +0800, Li RongQing wrote:
> > > Static key kvm_has_noapic_vcpu should be reduced when fail to create
> > > vcpu, this patch fixes it
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 5 ++++-
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c index
> > > 41cce50..2a22e66 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > > @@ -11957,7 +11957,10 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_create(struct kvm_vcpu
> > *vcpu)
> > >  	kfree(vcpu->arch.mci_ctl2_banks);
> > >  	free_page((unsigned long)vcpu->arch.pio_data);
> > >  fail_free_lapic:
> > > -	kvm_free_lapic(vcpu);
> > > +	if (!lapic_in_kernel(vcpu))
> > > +		static_branch_dec(&kvm_has_noapic_vcpu);
> > > +	else
> > > +		kvm_free_lapic(vcpu);
> > >  fail_mmu_destroy:
> > >  	kvm_mmu_destroy(vcpu);
> > >  	return r;
> > 
> > It is good to me. But is it better also take the chance to tidy up
> > kvm_arch_vcpu_destroy():
> > 
> > 	kvm_free_lapic(vcpu);
> > 	idx = srcu_read_lock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu);
> > 	kvm_mmu_destroy(vcpu);
> > 	srcu_read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu, idx);
> > 	free_page((unsigned long)vcpu->arch.pio_data);
> > 	kvfree(vcpu->arch.cpuid_entries);
> > 	if (!lapic_in_kernel(vcpu))
> > 		static_branch_dec(&kvm_has_noapic_vcpu);
> > 
> 
> Do you means that calling kvm_free_lapic when lapic_in_kernel is true?

Yes.

> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 2c92407..9d176c7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -12122,14 +12122,17 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>         kvm_pmu_destroy(vcpu);
>         kfree(vcpu->arch.mce_banks);
>         kfree(vcpu->arch.mci_ctl2_banks);
> -       kvm_free_lapic(vcpu);
> +
> +       if (lapic_in_kernel(vcpu))
> +               kvm_free_lapic(vcpu);
> +       else
> +               static_branch_dec(&kvm_has_noapic_vcpu);

Better keep the same style as in kvm_arch_vcpu_create():

  if (!lapic_in_kernel(vcpu))
	static_branch_dec(&kvm_has_noapic_vcpu);
  else
	kvm_free_lapic(vcpu);

Thanks,
Yilun

> +
>         idx = srcu_read_lock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu);
>         kvm_mmu_destroy(vcpu);
>         srcu_read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu, idx);
>         free_page((unsigned long)vcpu->arch.pio_data);
>         kvfree(vcpu->arch.cpuid_entries);
> -       if (!lapic_in_kernel(vcpu))
> -               static_branch_dec(&kvm_has_noapic_vcpu);
>  }
> 
>  void kvm_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event)
> 
> 
> 




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux