Re: [PATCH v6 11/16] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Split the large page when zap leaf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 11/7/2023 11:00 PM, isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@xxxxxxxxx>

When TDX enabled, a large page cannot be zapped if it contains mixed
pages. In this case, it has to split the large page.

Signed-off-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig            |  1 +
  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c          |  6 +--
  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h |  9 +++++
  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c      | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
  4 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig
index b0f103641547..557479737962 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig
@@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ config KVM_INTEL
  	tristate "KVM for Intel (and compatible) processors support"
  	depends on KVM && IA32_FEAT_CTL
  	select KVM_SW_PROTECTED_VM if INTEL_TDX_HOST
+	select KVM_GENERIC_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES if INTEL_TDX_HOST
  	select KVM_PRIVATE_MEM if INTEL_TDX_HOST
  	help
  	  Provides support for KVM on processors equipped with Intel's VT
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 265177cedf37..0bf043812644 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -7463,8 +7463,8 @@ bool kvm_arch_pre_set_memory_attributes(struct kvm *kvm,
  	return kvm_unmap_gfn_range(kvm, range);
  }
-static bool hugepage_test_mixed(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
-				int level)
+bool kvm_hugepage_test_mixed(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
+			     int level)
  {
  	return lpage_info_slot(gfn, slot, level)->disallow_lpage & KVM_LPAGE_MIXED_FLAG;
  }
@@ -7491,7 +7491,7 @@ static bool hugepage_has_attrs(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
  		return kvm_range_has_memory_attributes(kvm, start, end, attrs);
for (gfn = start; gfn < end; gfn += KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level - 1)) {
-		if (hugepage_test_mixed(slot, gfn, level - 1) ||
+		if (kvm_hugepage_test_mixed(slot, gfn, level - 1) ||
  		    attrs != kvm_get_memory_attributes(kvm, gfn))
  			return false;
  	}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
index 1da98be74ad2..653e96769956 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
@@ -460,4 +460,13 @@ void *mmu_memory_cache_alloc(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *mc);
  void track_possible_nx_huge_page(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp);
  void untrack_possible_nx_huge_page(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp);
+#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_GENERIC_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES
+bool kvm_hugepage_test_mixed(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn, int level);
+#else
+static inline bool kvm_hugepage_test_mixed(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn, int level)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+#endif
+
  #endif /* __KVM_X86_MMU_INTERNAL_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index 7873e9ee82ad..a209a67decae 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -964,6 +964,14 @@ bool kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_sp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
  	return true;
  }
+
+static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_alloc_sp_for_split(struct kvm *kvm,
+						       struct tdp_iter *iter,
+						       bool shared);
+
+static int tdp_mmu_split_huge_page(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *iter,
+				   struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, bool shared);
+
  /*
   * If can_yield is true, will release the MMU lock and reschedule if the
   * scheduler needs the CPU or there is contention on the MMU lock. If this
@@ -975,13 +983,15 @@ static bool tdp_mmu_zap_leafs(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
  			      gfn_t start, gfn_t end, bool can_yield, bool flush,
  			      bool zap_private)
  {
+	bool is_private = is_private_sp(root);
+	struct kvm_mmu_page *split_sp = NULL;
  	struct tdp_iter iter;
end = min(end, tdp_mmu_max_gfn_exclusive()); lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock); - WARN_ON_ONCE(zap_private && !is_private_sp(root));
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(zap_private && !is_private);
  	if (!zap_private && is_private_sp(root))
Can use is_private instead of is_private_sp(root) here as well.

  		return false;
@@ -1006,12 +1016,66 @@ static bool tdp_mmu_zap_leafs(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
  		    !is_last_spte(iter.old_spte, iter.level))
  			continue;
+ if (is_private && kvm_gfn_shared_mask(kvm) &&
+		    is_large_pte(iter.old_spte)) {
+			gfn_t gfn = iter.gfn & ~kvm_gfn_shared_mask(kvm);
+			gfn_t mask = KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(iter.level) - 1;
+			struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
+			struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
+
+			slot = gfn_to_memslot(kvm, gfn);
+			if (kvm_hugepage_test_mixed(slot, gfn, iter.level) ||
+			    (gfn & mask) < start ||
+			    end < (gfn & mask) + KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(iter.level)) {
+				WARN_ON_ONCE(!can_yield);
+				if (split_sp) {
+					sp = split_sp;
+					split_sp = NULL;
+					sp->role = tdp_iter_child_role(&iter);
+				} else {
+					WARN_ON(iter.yielded);
+					if (flush && can_yield) {
+						kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
+						flush = false;
+					}
Is it necessary to do the flush here?

+					sp = tdp_mmu_alloc_sp_for_split(kvm, &iter, false);
+					if (iter.yielded) {
+						split_sp = sp;
+						continue;
+					}
+				}
+				KVM_BUG_ON(!sp, kvm);
+
+				tdp_mmu_init_sp(sp, iter.sptep, iter.gfn);
+				if (tdp_mmu_split_huge_page(kvm, &iter, sp, false)) {
+					kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
+					flush = false;
Why it needs to flush TLB immediately if tdp_mmu_split_huge_page() fails?

Also, when KVM MMU write lock is held, it seems tdp_mmu_split_huge_page()
will not fail. But let's assume this condition can be triggered, since sp is local
variable, it will lost its value after continue, and split_sp is also NULL,
it will try to allocate a new sp, memory leakage here?

+					/* force retry on this gfn. */
+					iter.yielded = true;
+				} else
+					flush = true;
+				continue;
+			}
+		}
+
  		tdp_mmu_iter_set_spte(kvm, &iter, SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE);
  		flush = true;
  	}
rcu_read_unlock(); + if (split_sp) {
+		WARN_ON(!can_yield);
+		if (flush) {
+			kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
+			flush = false;
+		}
Same here, why we need to do the flush here?
Can we delay it till the caller do the flush?

+
+		write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+		tdp_mmu_free_sp(split_sp);
+		write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+	}
+
  	/*
  	 * Because this flow zaps _only_ leaf SPTEs, the caller doesn't need
  	 * to provide RCU protection as no 'struct kvm_mmu_page' will be freed.
@@ -1606,8 +1670,6 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_alloc_sp_for_split(struct kvm *kvm,
KVM_BUG_ON(kvm_mmu_page_role_is_private(role) !=
  		   is_private_sptep(iter->sptep), kvm);
-	/* TODO: Large page isn't supported for private SPTE yet. */
-	KVM_BUG_ON(kvm_mmu_page_role_is_private(role), kvm);
/*
  	 * Since we are allocating while under the MMU lock we have to be





[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux