On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 11:11:52AM +0530, Nikunj A. Dadhania wrote: > On 10/31/2023 1:56 AM, Tom Lendacky wrote: > >> diff --git a/include/linux/cc_platform.h b/include/linux/cc_platform.h > >> index cb0d6cd1c12f..e081ca4d5da2 100644 > >> --- a/include/linux/cc_platform.h > >> +++ b/include/linux/cc_platform.h > >> @@ -90,6 +90,14 @@ enum cc_attr { > >> * Examples include TDX Guest. > >> */ > >> CC_ATTR_HOTPLUG_DISABLED, > >> + > >> + /** > >> + * @CC_ATTR_GUEST_SECURE_TSC: Secure TSC is active. > >> + * > >> + * The platform/OS is running as a guest/virtual machine and actively > >> + * using AMD SEV-SNP Secure TSC feature. > > > > I think TDX also has a secure TSC like feature, so can this be generic? > > Yes, we can do that. In SNP case SecureTSC is an optional feature, not sure if that is the case for TDX as well. > > Kirill any inputs ? We have several X86_FEATURE_ flags to indicate quality of TSC. Do we really need a CC_ATTR on top of that? Maybe SEV code could just set X86_FEATURE_ according to what its TSC can do? -- Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov