On Sun, Oct 29, 2023, José Pekkarinen wrote: > Reported by coccinelle, there is a do_div call that does > 64-by-32 divisions even in 64bit platforms, this patch will > move it to div64_ul macro that will decide the correct > division function for the platform underneath. The output > the warning follows: > > arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c:1948:1-7: WARNING: do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, please consider using div64_ul instead. > > Signed-off-by: José Pekkarinen <jose.pekkarinen@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c > index 3e977dbbf993..0b90c6ad5091 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c > @@ -1945,7 +1945,7 @@ static void start_sw_tscdeadline(struct kvm_lapic *apic) > guest_tsc = kvm_read_l1_tsc(vcpu, rdtsc()); > > ns = (tscdeadline - guest_tsc) * 1000000ULL; > - do_div(ns, this_tsc_khz); > + div64_ul(ns, this_tsc_khz); Well this is silly, virtual_tsc_khz is a u32. unsigned long this_tsc_khz = vcpu->arch.virtual_tsc_khz; struct kvm_vcpu_arch { ... u32 virtual_tsc_khz; } I assume this will make coccinelle happy? diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c index 245b20973cae..31e9c84b8791 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c @@ -1932,7 +1932,7 @@ static void start_sw_tscdeadline(struct kvm_lapic *apic) u64 ns = 0; ktime_t expire; struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = apic->vcpu; - unsigned long this_tsc_khz = vcpu->arch.virtual_tsc_khz; + u32 this_tsc_khz = vcpu->arch.virtual_tsc_khz; unsigned long flags; ktime_t now;