Emm, did we miss this little fix ?
On 11/10/2023 12:12 am, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
У сб, 2023-10-07 у 14:40 +0800, Like Xu пише:
From: Like Xu <likexu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
The requested info will be stored in 'guest_xsave->region' referenced by
the incoming pointer "struct kvm_xsave *guest_xsave", thus there is no need
to explicitly use return void expression for a void function "static void
kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_get_xsave(...)". The issue is caught with [-Wpedantic].
Fixes: 2d287ec65e79 ("x86/fpu: Allow caller to constrain xfeatures when copying to uabi buffer")
Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index fdb2b0e61c43..2571466a317f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -5503,8 +5503,8 @@ static void kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_get_xsave2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
static void kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_get_xsave(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
struct kvm_xsave *guest_xsave)
{
- return kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_get_xsave2(vcpu, (void *)guest_xsave->region,
- sizeof(guest_xsave->region));
+ kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_get_xsave2(vcpu, (void *)guest_xsave->region,
+ sizeof(guest_xsave->region));
}
static int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_xsave(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
base-commit: 86701e115030e020a052216baa942e8547e0b487
Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
