On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 12:31:50PM +0200, Hans J. Koch wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 12:38:49PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > + j++; > > > + } > > > + } > > > + for (i = 0, j = 0; i < PCI_STD_RESOURCE_END && > > > + j < MAX_UIO_PORT_REGIONS; i++) { > > > + if (pci_resource_flags(pdev, i) & IORESOURCE_IO) { > > > + name = kmalloc(8, GFP_KERNEL); > > > + if (name == NULL) > > > + break; > > > + sprintf(name, "iobar%d", i); > > > + info->port[j].name = name; > > > + info->port[j].start = pci_resource_start(pdev, i); > > > + info->port[j].size = pci_resource_len(pdev, i); > > > + info->port[j].porttype = UIO_PORT_X86; > > > + j++; > > > > At least on x86, I think io bar can not be mmapped. > > That's right. porttype == UIO_PORT_X86 is only there for information > purposes. Userspace then knows that it cannot map this but has to use > things like inb(), outb() and friends after getting access rights with > ioperm()/iopl(). "start" and "size" gives userspace the information > needed to do this. > > Thanks, > Hans So that fails in the declared purpose of allowing an unpriveledged userspace driver, as inb/outb are priveledged operations. -- MST -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html