On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 02:18:10PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 08:06:06AM -0700, Yi Liu wrote:
> > @@ -195,6 +279,10 @@ int iommufd_hwpt_alloc(struct iommufd_ucmd *ucmd)
> > if (pt_obj->type == IOMMUFD_OBJ_IOAS) {
> > struct iommufd_hwpt_paging *hwpt_paging;
> >
> > + if (cmd->data_type != IOMMU_HWPT_DATA_NONE) {
> > + rc = -EINVAL;
> > + goto out_put_pt;
> > + }
> > ioas = container_of(pt_obj, struct iommufd_ioas, obj);
> > mutex_lock(&ioas->mutex);
> > hwpt_paging = iommufd_hwpt_paging_alloc(ucmd->ictx, ioas, idev,
>
> ?? What is this?
>
> Ah something went wrong earlier in "iommu: Pass in parent domain with
> user_data to domain_alloc_user op"
>
> Once we added the user_data we should flow it through to the op
> always.
Hmm, iommufd_hwpt_paging_alloc doesn't take (or need) user_data,
but we could pass in a dummy one if that looks better?
Thanks
Nicolin
