On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 07:32:31PM +0100, Joao Martins wrote: > Jason, how do we usually handle this cross trees? check_feature() doesn't exist > in your tree, but it does in Joerg's tree; meanwhile > check_feature_on_all_iommus() gets renamed to check_feature(). Should I need to > go with it, do I rebase against linux-next? I have been assuming that your tree > must compile; or worst-case different maintainer pull each other's trees. We didn't make any special preparation to speed this, so I would wait till next cycle to take the AMD patches Thus we should look at the vt-d patches if this is to go in this cycle. > Alternatively: I can check the counter directly to replicate the amd_iommu_efr > check under the current helper I made (amd_iommu_hd_support) and then change it > after the fact... That should lead to less dependencies? Or this We are fast running out of time though :) Jason
