On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 10:46:10AM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 09:04:54AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 12:14:01AM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 12:15:23AM -0700, Yi Liu wrote:
> > >
> > > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/iommufd.h b/include/uapi/linux/iommufd.h
> > > > index b4ba0c0cbab6..4a7c5c8fdbb4 100644
> > > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/iommufd.h
> > > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/iommufd.h
> > > > @@ -347,10 +347,20 @@ struct iommu_vfio_ioas {
> > > > };
> > > > #define IOMMU_VFIO_IOAS _IO(IOMMUFD_TYPE, IOMMUFD_CMD_VFIO_IOAS)
> > > >
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * enum iommufd_hwpt_alloc_flags - Flags for HWPT allocation
> > > > + * @IOMMU_HWPT_ALLOC_NEST_PARENT: If set, allocate a domain which can serve
> > > > + * as the parent domain in the nesting
> > > > + * configuration.
> > >
> > > I just noticed a nit here: we should probably align with other
> > > parts of this file by using "HWPT" v.s. "domain"? I.e.
> > >
> > > + * @IOMMU_HWPT_ALLOC_NEST_PARENT: If set, allocate a HWPT which can serve
> > > + * as the parent HWPT in the nesting
> > > + * configuration.
> >
> > Yes
>
> Should we resend? Or would it be possible for you to update it
> in your for-next tree?
At this point send a Fixes: patch
Jason
