Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 7/9] s390x: topology: Rewrite topology list test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Nina Schoetterl-Glausch (2023-10-11 10:56:30)
> Rewrite recursion with separate functions for checking containers,
> containers containing CPUs and CPUs.
> This improves comprehension and allows for more tests.
> We now also test for ordering of CPU TLEs and number of child entries.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[...]
> diff --git a/s390x/topology.c b/s390x/topology.c
> index c1f6520f..9838434c 100644
> --- a/s390x/topology.c
> +++ b/s390x/topology.c
[...]
> +static union topology_container *check_child_cpus(struct sysinfo_15_1_x *info,
> +                                                 union topology_container *cont,
> +                                                 union topology_cpu *child,
> +                                                 int *cpus_in_masks)
> +{
> +       void *last = ((void *)info) + info->length;
> +       union topology_cpu *prev_cpu = NULL;
> +       int cpus = 0;

I know __builtin_popcountl returns int, but maybe it makes sense to make
this and cpus_in_masks an unsigned type?

> +       for (; (void *)child < last && child->nl == 0; child++) {

Personal preference, I prefer simply iterating over a counter, but its up
to you.




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux