On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 06:05:11PM +0000, Oliver Upton wrote: > On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 05:59:28PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 05:51:57PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > > Rather than a copy, which makes the maintenance pretty horrible, why > > > don't you just symlink it? Git is perfectly capable of storing them, > > > last time I checked. > > Do we even need to symlink - as I suggested on the previous version can > > we not just reference the script and data file directly in the main > > kernel tree? Like I said then there may be some use case for building > So long as we aren't going to do any further renames I don't have an > issue with this approach. It doesn't seem likely, and it feels like it's reasonable to ask anyone who wants to do them to ensure they take care of the tools/ directory as part of it.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
