On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 10:45 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 10:35:00PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> > The SBI DBCN extension needs to be emulated in user-space
>
> Why?
The SBI debug console is similar to a console port available to
KVM Guest so the KVM user space tool (i.e. QEMU-KVM or
KVMTOOL) can redirect the input/output of SBI debug console
wherever it wants (e.g. telnet, file, stdio, etc).
We forward SBI DBCN calls to KVM user space so that the
in-kernel KVM does not need to be aware of the guest
console devices.
>
> > so let
> > us forward console_puts() call to user-space.
>
> What could go wrong!
>
> Why does userspace have to get involved in a console message? Why is
> this needed at all? The kernel can not handle userspace consoles as
> obviously they have to be re-entrant and irq safe.
As mentioned above, these are KVM guest console messages which
the VMM (i.e. KVM user-space) can choose to manage on its own.
This is more about providing flexibility to KVM user-space which
allows it to manage guest console devices.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h | 1 +
> > arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 1 +
> > arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c | 4 ++++
> > arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_replace.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 4 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h
> > index 8d6d4dce8a5e..a85f95eb6e85 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h
> > @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ extern const struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_extension vcpu_sbi_ext_ipi;
> > extern const struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_extension vcpu_sbi_ext_rfence;
> > extern const struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_extension vcpu_sbi_ext_srst;
> > extern const struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_extension vcpu_sbi_ext_hsm;
> > +extern const struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_extension vcpu_sbi_ext_dbcn;
> > extern const struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_extension vcpu_sbi_ext_experimental;
> > extern const struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_extension vcpu_sbi_ext_vendor;
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> > index 917d8cc2489e..60d3b21dead7 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> > @@ -156,6 +156,7 @@ enum KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_ID {
> > KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_PMU,
> > KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_EXPERIMENTAL,
> > KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_VENDOR,
> > + KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_DBCN,
> > KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_MAX,
>
> You just broke a user/kernel ABI here, why?
The KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_MAX only represents the number
of entries in "enum KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_ID" so we are not
breaking "enum KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_ID" rather appending
new ID to existing enum.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Thanks,
Anup
